I think very highly of the ISM, but that is probably because I've been to Palestine twice with the ISM. ISM doesn't have an ideology of non-violence. The use of non-violence and non-violent intervention is based on a very careful analysis of the conflict. ISM doesn't pass moral judgement on the violent Palestinian resistance
ISM on Palsestinian resistance:
As enshrined in international law and UN resolutions, we recognise the Palestinian right to resist Israeli violence and occupation via legitimate armed struggle. However, we believe that nonviolence can be a powerful weapon in fighting oppression and we are committed to the principles of nonviolent resistance.
In effect ISM believes that in the context of the I-P conflict non-violence can be a very powerful tool. That they recognize the armed resistance can also be down to political efficacy - you don't want the militant groups on your bad side.
Some ISM activists are non-violent ideologues and discussions about e.g. stone throwing can be quite fierce. Also if you do partake in violence you will get thrown out of ISM if it is noticed by people who care (this has happened several times). Personally I am not a non-violent ideologue at all, though in the case of Palestine I am in almost full agreement with the ISM. In other contexts however, I believe that violence is our would be necessary.
The training given to volunteers is pretty good, though it can be better. For me the training was very good the first time I went (you have to do every time you go regardless). I was pretty anxious about what I would experience, but the training prepared me pretty well for what I did encounter. You get some very good info on what to do in certain situations such as how to de-arrest someone, how to recognize various weapons (e.g. the difference in the sound of a round of live or rubber ammo), how to deal with interrogation if you're arrested and so on and so forth.
The important thing about being in Palestine as an international is this IMO
Internationals with the ISM are not in Palestine to teach nonviolent resistance. Palestinians resist nonviolently ever day. The ISM lends support to the Palestinian resistance to the occupation and their demand for freedom.
ISM does this through
* Direct Action - challenging crippling checkpoints and curfew, confronting tanks and demolition equipment, removing roadblocks, participating in nonviolent demonstrations, accompanying farmers to their fields and protecting families whose homes are threatened with demolition.
* Emergency Mobilization - escorting ambulances through checkpoints, delivering food and water to families under curfew or house arrest, assisting the injured or disabled to access medical care and walking children to school.
* Documentation - documenting and reporting to local and international media about the daily life under occupation and the countless human rights and international law violations by the Israeli military.
To join the ISM in Palestine, you must adhere to the following principles:
1. Belief in freedom for the Palestinian people based on all relevant United Nations Resolutions and international law.
2. Using only nonviolent, direct-action methods, strategies and principles to work towards our goal.
Tactically nvda makes a lot of sense in lots of places in Palestine, sometimes even strategically. E.g. the village of Budrus managed to move the wall away from the planned route so that they lost very little land compared to almost all of it. In Bil'in the protests have also been successful on a legal level - the Israeli Supreme Court has said that the wall must be moved (of course in practice nothing has changed, which is not a big surprise). In Qawawis, a small village south of Hebron, the presence of internationals made it possible for villagers to move back and feel safe.
If you have any more specific questions about my views on and experience of the ISM I'd be happy to try to answer them.


What do people think of the International Solidarity Movement, specifically their ideology of non-violence and the training given to volunteers before taking part? I do accept of course that you can' t go attacking Israeli soldiers with machine guns etc, are there some situations where nonviolence is appropriate at least as a strategy? Replies from communists/autonomists/anarchists who may have taken part would be interesting.